Navigation About Mode >LTR>

counting and account

preface

In this paper, I explore the deep connection between painting and writing, focusing on how both mediums function as forms of accounting (narrating or reporting) and the principle of counting (measuring, reckoning, or organizing). Both painting and writing serve as powerful tools for communication, capable of evoking mental imagery - what we can term “mind-pictures.” These mind-pictures transcend the medium itself, drawing the viewer or reader into a world of ideas, emotions, and symbolic representation.

By examining the parallels between these two art forms - such as their shared ability to translate abstract thoughts into visual or written form, the creation of vivid mental images, reliance on composition and structure, use of symbolism, and their storytelling power - we reveal how painting and writing are deeply interconnected. In the act of accounting, both the painter and the writer recount a narrative or convey an experience, guiding the audience through the representation of external and internal worlds. Just as a painting tells a story through its visual elements, writing communicates through words, each sentence forming brushstrokes on the canvas of the reader’s mind.

Counting plays an equally significant role. In painting, this is seen through the deliberate organization of elements - proportion, perspective, and balance - that work to convey meaning. Similarly, in writing, the structure - whether through meter, rhythm, or narrative pacing - guides the reader, creating an ordered progression of ideas. Both art forms rely on a calculated system of organization that shapes the viewer’s or reader’s experience, underscoring how counting is inherent to the artistic process.

Thus, we find that painting is like writing, and writing is like painting, as both engage the observer’s imagination, offering a dialogue between the artist’s intent and the audience’s interpretation. Ultimately, both are forms of storytelling and emotional expression, where the acts of accounting and counting blend to shape the mental and emotional landscapes they evoke.

why dozen(12) based counting systems historically where preferred over metric(10) ones

Dozen-based counting systems (base-12 or duodecimal) have been historically preferred in certain contexts over base-10 (metric) systems for several practical reasons:

1. Divisibility:

The number 12 is divisible by more factors than 10. Specifically, 12 can be divided evenly by 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, whereas 10 can only be divided by 1, 2, and 5. This makes it easier to work with fractions. For example, dividing something into thirds (1/3) in a base-12 system results in 4 (1/3 of 12), while in base-10, it leads to a repeating decimal (0.333…).

2. Convenience for Trade and Measurement:

Before the metric system, many cultures and civilizations relied on systems that were better suited for everyday tasks like trade and measurement. Base-12 was especially useful for splitting goods into common fractions like halves, thirds, and quarters. For instance, if you wanted to divide a dozen eggs or a dozen loaves of bread, it was easier to make practical divisions with 12 than with 10.

3. Cultural and Historical Precedents:

Ancient systems, including those used by the Sumerians and Babylonians, frequently relied on base-12 or base-60 counting systems. These systems had long-lasting influences on calendars, timekeeping, and measurement. For example, we still use base-12 in time (12 hours in a day) and in measurements (12 inches in a foot). This historical inertia kept base-12 systems in use for centuries.

4. Dozen as a Natural Unit:

The dozen was a convenient unit for grouping items, especially in commerce. A dozen allows for easy bulk trading, packaging, and pricing. Even today, items like eggs, baked goods, and other goods are commonly sold in dozens, showing the continued relevance of this system.

5. Fingers and Counting:

There’s a theory that base-12 may have been favoured because it is easy to count on fingers. You can count each segment of four fingers (excluding the thumb) on one hand, reaching up to 12, while using the other hand to keep track of the number of dozens. This contrasts with the base-10 system, which typically uses all ten fingers.

While the metric system’s base-10 system was introduced for standardization and ease of calculation in modern times, these historical and practical reasons explain why dozen-based systems persisted for so long and are still used in some contexts today.

base 12 being the higher order aka ‘GODS’ vs. base 10 being natural human

The symbolic distinction between 12 and 10 in various cultures has deeper mythological, religious, and philosophical meanings, reflecting higher-order concepts (12) versus human or natural order (10).

1. 12 as a Symbol of Higher Order (Gods, Divine, or Cosmic)

2. 10 as the Symbol of Natural or Human Order

3. Contrast between 12 and 10 in Symbolism

4. Cultural Perceptions

Conclusion

The symbolic difference between 12 and 10 reflects broader philosophical and cultural concepts: 12 as a representation of divine, cosmic, or higher-order realms, and 10 as a symbol of human nature and the material world. This contrast permeates mythology, religion, and even the way systems of measurement and counting evolved over time. The preference for base-12 systems in certain contexts can be seen as a reflection of striving toward the divine or universal order, while base-10 systems remain grounded in human experience.

how does this reflect in the broader concept of counting and accounts

The distinction between 12 (cosmic/divine order) and 10 (human/natural order) also influences broader concepts of counting, accounting, and numerical systems. This duality can be seen in how societies organize systems of measurement, commerce, and governance, reflecting deeper philosophical and symbolic meanings. Here’s how this division plays out in counting and accounts:

1. Base-12 and the Divine or Higher Order in Accounting

In ancient times, the use of base-12 counting systems often reflected a desire to align human activities - such as trade, measurement, and governance - with cosmic or divine principles. This gave a deeper, spiritual significance to practical tasks like accounting and commerce.

2. Base-10 and Human Accounting

In contrast, base-10 counting systems emerged more naturally from human experience, particularly the use of fingers for counting. This base-10 system reflects a more human-centric approach to accounting, grounded in practicality, simplicity, and daily life.

3. Base-12 vs. Base-10 in Historical Commerce and Accounts

The tension between base-12 and base-10 systems has manifested in the evolution of commerce and financial systems. Historically, many cultures relied on base-12 (or related systems like base-60), but as societies evolved, particularly during the Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution, base-10 became more dominant.

4. Symbolism in Modern Accounting and Financial Systems

Even in modern accounting, traces of this symbolic division between base-12 (higher order) and base-10 (human order) can be found. While most financial systems today rely on base-10, the persistence of base-12 in certain areas reflects a continued blending of the practical with the symbolic.

5. Broader Implications in Governance and Law

The division between base-12 and base-10 also extends into governance, law, and societal structures:

Conclusion

In broader concepts of counting and accounting, base-12 reflects divine or cosmic order, with connections to higher realms, religion, and ancient systems of commerce and governance, while base-10 represents human-centred practicality and natural order. Both systems have shaped how societies count, measure, and account for resources, and their symbolic meanings continue to influence the way we structure time, financial systems, and governance today.

a synopsis over the three questions so far

1. Why were dozen-based (12) counting systems preferred over metric (10) systems?

Dozen-based systems (base-12) were historically favoured because 12 is more divisible than 10, allowing easier partitioning into common fractions like halves, thirds, and quarters. This was practical for trade and commerce, especially in ancient societies. Base-12 also has cultural and historical roots, with connections to timekeeping and measurement systems, such as the 12 hours in a day or 12 inches in a foot. These systems persisted due to their practicality in daily life and trade, while the base-10 (metric) system gained popularity for its simplicity in modern, standardized accounting.

2. Symbolic meaning of 12 (higher order) vs. 10 (human/natural order)

In various cultures, the number 12 is often linked to divine or cosmic order, representing higher realms, completeness, and spiritual systems, as seen in 12 Olympian gods, 12 apostles, and 12 zodiac signs. Meanwhile, 10 is associated with human experience, being the number of fingers used for counting and reflecting practical, human-centred systems like the decimal system. The number 10 signifies human completeness in a natural or material sense, while 12 represents a transcendent or divine structure governing the cosmos.

3. How does this reflect in broader concepts of counting and accounting?

The distinction between base-12 (divine order) and base-10 (human order) influences broader accounting and numerical systems. Historically, base-12 systems connected trade, governance, and timekeeping to cosmic cycles and divine principles. Base-10, being grounded in human anatomy and practicality, became dominant in modern accounting and finance for its simplicity and ease of use. However, traces of base-12 persist in time-based systems (12 months, 12 hours) and certain financial structures due to its superior divisibility and symbolic ties to higher, cosmic order.

Relevance to time, flow and storytelling by the example of Meander

The concept of Meander - a winding, non-linear flow - can serve as a powerful metaphor for understanding the relationship between time, flow, and storytelling, especially when viewed through the symbolic lens of base-12 (higher order) vs. base-10 (human order).

1. Meander as a Metaphor for Time

The Meander pattern, named after the winding Meander River in ancient Greece, represents a path that is non-linear, fluid, and cyclical. This is significant in storytelling and timekeeping because it contrasts with the linear, rigid structure of time often seen in base-10 or modern systems.

2. Meander and Storytelling: Non-Linear Narratives

In storytelling, the Meander pattern can represent a non-linear narrative, where the flow of events isn’t strictly bound by a rigid structure but meanders through time, space, and meaning, much like ancient myths or epics. This mirrors the base-12 concept of higher order storytelling, where stories align with the rhythms of the cosmos, cyclical time, or divine order.

3. Flow and the Meander in Time and Accounts

The flow of time and resources in both storytelling and accounting systems can be understood through the Meander metaphor.

4. Relevance to Storytelling and Human Experience

The Meander’s symbolic winding path offers insight into the way humans experience time, memory, and narrative:

5. Broader Implications: Meander as a Bridge Between Systems

The Meander can be seen as a bridge between base-12 (cyclical, divine order) and base-10 (linear, human order). In storytelling, accounting, and timekeeping, it represents a synthesis of both worlds:

Meander a profound metaphor

The concept of the Meander offers a profound metaphor for how time, flow, and storytelling operate across different symbolic systems. In base-12, time and storytelling reflect a higher, divine order, cyclical and cosmic, much like the winding flow of the river. Base-10 represents human-centred logic, linear progression, and predictability. The Meander allows for the coexistence of both: fluidity within structure, where divine and human systems of time, accounting, and narrative flow together.

other concepts than base-12 and base-10, numeric and non-numeric ones

Many other numeric and non-numeric systems of organizing and understanding the world exists that go beyond the familiar base-10 and base-12 systems. These systems have been used throughout history and in different cultures, often reflecting unique worldviews, practical needs, and symbolic understandings. Below are some examples of both numeric and non-numeric concepts used for counting, organizing, and interpreting the world.

Numeric Systems Beyond Base-10 and Base-12

1. Base-60 (Sexagesimal System)

2. Base-2 (Binary System)

3. Base-5 (Quinary System)

4. Base-20 (Vigesimal System)

5. Base-8 (Octal System)

Non-Numeric Concepts of Organization

Beyond numeric bases, there are non-numeric systems of organization and understanding that provide alternate ways of framing reality, particularly in storytelling, time, philosophy, and culture.

1. Four Elements (Classical Elements)

2. The Five Phases (Wu Xing)

3. The Hero’s Journey (Monomyth)

4. I Ching (Yijing) Hexagrams

5. The Seven Chakras

Concepts of Time Beyond Numbers

1. Cyclical vs. Linear Time

2. Narrative Structures

Beyond base-12 and base-10 systems

There are numerous numeric and non-numeric ways of organizing time, counting, storytelling, and understanding the world. From base-60 and base-20 systems to non-numeric systems like the chakras or Wu Xing, these alternate concepts offer unique perspectives on human experience, emphasizing cyclical, dynamic, or interconnected realities rather than linear or purely quantitative ones. These systems reflect the diversity of cultural approaches to counting, time, and meaning, where numbers may symbolize much more than just practical measures.

Ilyas 10 Trojan years - war, human, heroic, fight against love
Odyssey 12 travels of Odysseus - divine intervention, exploration, knowledge, travel for love

(https://www2.classics.upenn.edu/myth/php/homer/index.php?page=odymap)

the concept of a Mind-Picture

The concept of a Mind-Picture refers to a mental image or visual representation that forms in the mind, often as a result of thought, memory, or imagination. It’s a way for the mind to organize and visualize abstract concepts, emotions, or memories. Mind-pictures are central to visual thinking, where ideas are processed as images rather than just words or symbols.

Key Aspects of Mind-Pictures:

  1. Visualization of Abstract Ideas: Mind-pictures help in visualizing intangible or abstract ideas. For instance, when someone is explaining a concept like “freedom,” a person might form a mental image of an open sky or a bird in flight.

  2. Memory and Recall: Mind-pictures are closely tied to how we recall memories. Instead of remembering everything in words, people often remember past events in the form of mental images or scenes, which can sometimes be vivid and detailed.

  3. Creative Thinking: Mind-pictures are often used in creative thinking and problem-solving. Artists, designers, and innovators frequently rely on these mental images to guide their work, whether they are visualizing a painting, a product design, or a narrative structure.

  4. Mental Simulation: Mind-pictures allow us to mentally simulate future actions or situations. For example, an athlete might visualize their performance before a game, or someone might picture how a conversation might unfold.

  5. Emotional Connections: These mental images can evoke strong emotions, either positive or negative. A memory of a beautiful landscape might bring a sense of peace, while the image of a stressful situation might induce anxiety.

  6. Metaphorical Mind-Pictures: In storytelling, philosophy, or teaching, mind-pictures are often used metaphorically. Teachers, for instance, might describe complex ideas in visual terms to help students create a mental image and understand the concept better.

Applications of Mind-Pictures:

Mind-pictures play a crucial role in how we think, remember, imagine, and communicate. They serve as a bridge between abstract thought and sensory experience, allowing us to “see” what we cannot physically observe.

Keeping this in mind, why painting is (like) writing vice versa

The idea that painting is like writing (and vice versa) can be understood through the lens of mind-pictures, where both mediums - painting and writing - are forms of communication that create mental imagery in the audience. Both artists and writers use their respective tools to evoke images, emotions, and ideas in the mind of the viewer or reader, making the two art forms deeply interconnected. Here’s how they parallel each other:

  1. Both Translate Abstract Thoughts into Visual Form Painting: Painters transform abstract ideas, emotions, or concepts into a physical, visual representation using colour, shape, and composition. The process of painting is like externalizing the mind-picture onto a canvas, enabling the viewer to see what the artist imagined or perceived.

Writing: Writers do something very similar but with words. Through descriptive language, metaphor, and narrative, writers paint mental pictures in the minds of their readers. A well-written description can evoke vivid images that readers visualize, making writing a form of painting with words.

Both art forms are essentially translating inner experiences, thoughts, or emotions into forms that others can experience. Just as a painting can represent a scene, so can a well-written paragraph create a visual image in the reader’s mind.

  1. Creating Mental Images (Mind-Pictures) In Painting: The visual representation is immediate - the colours, shapes, and lines directly stimulate the viewer’s mind-pictures. When looking at a painting, the viewer interprets what they see, often connecting it with their own memories or emotions, forming a unique mental image of the artwork.

In Writing: Though words are abstract symbols, a writer carefully chooses them to evoke specific sensory and visual experiences. For example, when describing “a dark forest with moonlight filtering through the trees,” the reader forms a vivid mental image of that scene, much like viewing a painting of a similar setting.

In both cases, the audience is actively participating in the creation of the mind-picture, interpreting the artist’s or writer’s cues to build a mental image that resonates with their personal experiences or imagination.

  1. Both Rely on Composition and Structure Composition in Painting: The painter organizes elements like balance, symmetry, focus, and perspective to guide the viewer’s eye and create an overall aesthetic experience. The composition of a painting directs how the viewer processes the visual information and forms meaning.

Structure in Writing: Writers similarly use narrative structure, sentence rhythm, and literary devices like symbolism and imagery to guide the reader through the text. Just as composition in painting leads the eye, narrative structure leads the mind, helping the reader form a coherent mental picture.

In this sense, a well-structured story or poem is much like a well-composed painting; both create a harmonious experience, moving the audience through different mental states and impressions.

  1. Both Communicate Through Symbolism Painting: Artists use visual symbols - colours, objects, or abstract forms - to represent deeper meanings. A single element in a painting, like a red rose or a stormy sky, might carry symbolic meaning beyond its literal depiction, creating layers of interpretation in the viewer’s mind.

Writing: Writers do the same, using words and phrases that carry symbolic weight. Metaphor, simile, and allegory are literary techniques that parallel the symbolic use of imagery in painting. For example, describing someone’s life as “a winding road” evokes a mental picture of a journey filled with twists and turns, symbolizing challenges and life events.

In both cases, the artist or writer asks the audience to look beyond the literal and interpret the underlying meaning, drawing upon their inner world of mental imagery.

  1. Both Are Forms of Storytelling Narrative in Painting: Paintings often tell stories, whether in a single image or across a series of works. Historical paintings, mythological depictions, or even abstract art can convey a sense of time, sequence, or narrative. The viewer “reads” the painting by moving their attention across different parts, creating a narrative in their mind.

Narrative in Writing: Writing, especially in prose and poetry, explicitly tells stories, unfolding over time and through language. Readers follow characters, events, and emotions, building a mental narrative as they proceed. The act of storytelling in writing uses imagery and descriptive language to paint scenes, characters, and emotions in the reader’s mind, much like how a painting visually captures moments in time. Both forms invite the audience to engage in a mental journey that unravels over time, whether it’s through the written word or the painted image.

In both mediums, the artist or writer offers a perspective, but it is the observer or reader who completes the story, interpreting and imagining details that may not be explicitly presented. This interplay between creator and audience highlights how painting and writing are both collaborative forms of storytelling, relying on the shared imagination of both parties to fully bring the story to life.

The relationship between painting and writing is rooted in their shared goal of evoking mind-pictures. Through composition, structure, symbolism, and storytelling, both art forms translate abstract thoughts and emotions into forms that others can experience. Whether through a brushstroke on canvas or a carefully crafted sentence, both mediums engage the audience’s imagination, making them powerful tools for creating mental images, narratives, and emotional responses. Painting is like writing, and vice versa, because both allow us to communicate the intangible through a tangible medium, inviting others into our inner world of thoughts and visions.

Count, recount, account systems, which are based on the Fibonacci or Prime numbers taking “painting is like writing” and “mind-pictures” in consideration.

There are systems based on Fibonacci and prime numbers used in both mathematical and artistic contexts, and they can be related to the concept of accounting, recounting, and mind-pictures. While these systems are more frequently found in mathematics, nature, and design, they can be creatively applied to storytelling, writing, and visual art.

Let’s break this down by considering how painting is like writing and how mind-pictures are evoked using these number systems.

Fibonacci-Based Systems in Art and Writing

The Fibonacci sequence (0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, …) is closely related to the golden ratio, which has been used for centuries in composition, architecture, and design. Artists and writers use Fibonacci-based structures to create aesthetic balance, rhythm, and harmony in their works, which directly ties into how these mediums are constructed and perceived.

  1. In Painting:
    • The Fibonacci sequence is often used to design the composition of paintings. Many classical works, from Leonardo da Vinci’s to Salvador Dalí’s, use the golden ratio to position key elements, ensuring a naturally appealing and balanced layout.
    • Example: Dalí’s “The Sacrament of the Last Supper” is often cited as being structured according to the golden ratio, with proportions and spacing evoking a harmonious image that draws the eye to specific focal points, creating an organized “account” of the scene.
  2. In Writing:
    • In literature and storytelling, Fibonacci-like structuring can create a narrative rhythm that mirrors natural patterns of growth and progression, offering a layered and expansive story that slowly builds, much like the expanding Fibonacci sequence.
    • In a novel or poem, chapters or verses can be structured around Fibonacci numbers, starting small and growing in length or complexity. This mirrors the way ideas or tension can “unfold” like in a Fibonacci spiral.

    • For example, a short story could start with a single event (1), followed by two parallel actions (2), three interwoven themes (3), and continue building with five interconnected characters (5), creating a narrative spiral that deepens as the story progresses.

Prime-Based Systems in Art and Writing

Prime numbers (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, …) have unique mathematical properties because they are divisible only by 1 and themselves. These numbers create a sense of irregularity, structure, and mystery, often applied in artistic and literary forms to evoke complexity and patterns hidden beneath the surface.

  1. In Painting:
    • Artists might use primes to define spacing, proportions, or repetitions in a composition. Using prime numbers in this way creates non-repeating, organic patterns, which can lend an artwork a sense of unpredictability or uniqueness.
    • Piet Mondrian’s grid paintings and Islamic art’s geometric designs both use systems inspired by primes to create patterns that seem orderly yet non-repetitive, drawing the viewer into deeper contemplation, just like the flow of a narrative account.
  2. In Writing:
    • Prime numbers can structure poems, chapters, or acts in a play. Prime-based systems might create unexpected twists, where crucial events or revelations happen at the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 11th points in the narrative, guiding readers to count forward in anticipation while also keeping them off-balance due to the non-linear progression.
    • Experimental poetry or modernist prose, such as James Joyce’s Ulysses, could incorporate prime numbers in paragraph lengths, sentence structures, or chapter divisions, creating a complex, unpredictable rhythm that challenges readers to “decode” the narrative structure.

Relevance to Mind-Pictures and Accounting

The application of Fibonacci or prime systems to both painting and writing creates structured forms that appeal to the mind’s sense of order and aesthetic harmony. These structures help build and reinforce mental images in unique ways:

Painting is Like Writing – Using Fibonacci and Primes

Both Fibonacci and prime-based structures are, in essence, accounting systems for how a story or image is constructed and experienced. They help organize complex visual and narrative elements, much like how an accountant organizes numbers to build a financial report.

  1. Accounting in Painting:
    • Artists use these number-based systems to structure their visual storytelling. The act of “accounting” in this sense is the careful counting of proportions, patterns, and relationships between elements in the artwork to create a harmonious or dynamic composition.
  2. Accounting in Writing:
    • Writers can also “account” for narrative flow using these systems, creating a scaffold on which the counting of words, sentences, or chapters happens according to Fibonacci or prime patterns. This hidden structure adds depth and rhythm, subtly guiding how the reader forms mind-pictures and interprets the unfolding narrative.

powerful tools for organizing

While not traditionally thought of as accounting systems, Fibonacci and prime numbers serve as powerful tools for organizing and counting elements in both visual art and writing. They allow creators to structure complex, organic forms that naturally engage the viewer or reader’s imagination, helping to construct vivid mental images—or mind-pictures—that tell a deeper story. By intertwining these number systems with narrative and visual elements, both painting and writing become forms of accounting, recounting, and creating deeply immersive experiences.



     
account and counting Part1 account_and counting Part 2 account and counting Part3
account and counting Part4 account and counting Main account and counting Part8
account and counting Part6 account and counting Part7 account and counting Part9
Navigation about account structure test